While you reside on the intersections of a number of identities, anniversaries of your civil rights struggles may be each bitter and candy. And final week was a reminder.
At 12:01 am on Might 17, 2004, the Metropolis of Cambridge was the primary to subject marriage licenses to same-sex . At 9:15 am, the primary couple was married. Then-Cambridge Metropolis Clerk Margaret Drury stated to Tanya McCloskey and Marcia Kadish, “I now pronounce you married beneath the legal guidelines of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts.”
That day was additionally the 50th anniversary of the historic US Supreme Courtroom case of Brown v. Board of Training, a ruling that upended this nation’s “separate however equal” doctrine, adopted within the Plessy v. Ferguson choice of 1896.
Whereas pleasure washed over me that day figuring out my now-spouse and I might comply with McCluskey’s and Kadish’s footsteps and be legally married, we couldn’t rejoice over the restricted success, enormous failures, and ongoing resistance of “Brown” that allowed a couple of of us entry into a few of the high universities of this nation, because it continues to be challenged as a type of reverse discrimination.
On this 12 months’s 65th anniversary of Brown, African People and Latinx People proceed to attend not solely segregated faculties—whether or not right here in Boston or throughout the nation—additionally they attend high-poverty city ones with metallic detectors. All because the school-to-prison pipeline continues to compromise younger lives.
The place it was as soon as thought that entry to high quality schooling would dismantle, for future generations, the pox of bigotry and ignorance that sure mother and father inherited, race and sophistication, sadly, proceed to be discriminating indices upholding not solely “separate” college techniques but in addition “unequal” remedy of scholars.
This Might marked the 15th anniversary of marriage equality within the Commonwealth. Trying again at advances comparable to hate crime legal guidelines, the repeal of “don’t ask, don’t inform” and DOMA, the legalization of marriage equality, and anti-homophobic bullying changing into a nationwide concern, to call a couple of, the LGBTQ group has come a great distance for the reason that first Satisfaction marches. I give thanks for these advances and for having had the chance to write down Chief Justice Margaret H. Marshall, who wrote the landmark choice in Goodridge v. Division of Public Well being, the next word in 2016:
After I left for NECN (New England Cable Information) on Friday I by no means imagined in my wildest goals I might meet you there. And, of all issues take a bunch picture with you and my buddies Sue O’Connell and Scott Kearnan. WOW! And, thanks!
The closest I got here to assembly you was as soon as many tables faraway from the stage you spoke from as GLAD’s 2013 Spirit of Justice Awardee. A tsunami of thanks I ship your approach for authoring the Goodridge case, permitting me and so lots of my LGBTQ brothers and sisters throughout this lovely Commonwealth of Massachusetts to marry the individual we love.
As an African American lesbian, there aren’t too many locations on this nation I really feel protected by state legal guidelines. The Goodridge choice bestowed upon me full citizen-state rights that when same-sex marriage was legally acknowledged on Might 17, 2004, I then started to proudly carry my voice and say, “I, too, am Massachusetts!”
This June would be the fourth anniversary of Obergefell v. Hodges, the historic US Supreme Courtroom ruling that legalized same-sex marriage in all 50 states. The ruling was a fantastic day—related, I surmise, to that day in June 1967 when the Supreme Courtroom case of Loving v. the State of Virginia declared anti-miscegenation legal guidelines unconstitutional.
Nevertheless, with victory comes backlash. Opposition to the SCOTUS choice went public with born-again Christian Kim Davis—the now notorious Kentucky County clerk who not solely refused to subject marriage licenses to a same-sex couple however forbade her co-workers to take action as effectively.
Now, there may be the speak amongst Christian evangelicals of strolling again Obergefell v. Hodges “with out disrupting different precedents on marriage.” As Rebecca Buckwalter-Poza wrote in an article titled “The Finish of Homosexual Rights” within the June 2017 subject of Pacific Customary Journal: “The Supreme Courtroom can considerably undermine LGBT rights even with out reversing a single case. The Courtroom can strip the rights to intimacy and marriage of their that means, carving away progressively and masking the magnitude of adjustments by phrasing them in arcane authorized phrases.”
And final 12 months, the Supreme Courtroom dominated in Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado Civil Rights Fee in favor of Jack Phillips, the baker who refused to make a marriage cake for a same-sex couple on the grounds of non secular freedom.
Once more, over time, I’ve discovered that pleasure can share its house with disappointment.
Might 17 is at all times a type of days.